Governance
AI Governance Documentation
Last updated: March 22, 2026
AI Vitals is classified as a high-risk AI system under EU AI Act Annex III, Category 4 — it evaluates AI proficiency in workforce contexts where results may inform employment decisions. This page is our compliance record: the controls we've built, the obligations we accept, and where employer responsibility begins.
1. System Classification
EU AI Act Classification: High-Risk (Annex III, Category 4)
AI Vitals is an AI system used for employment, worker management, and access to self-employment — specifically, evaluating AI proficiency in a workforce context. This places it in Category 4 of the EU AI Act's high-risk categories.
This classification applies when AI Vitals scores are used to inform employment decisions (hiring, promotion, training allocation, performance review). Employers bear responsibility for ensuring their use of AI Vitals scores complies with applicable law in their jurisdiction.
2. EU AI Act — Article 4 Compliance
Article 4 requires that providers of high-risk AI systems give users the AI literacy to operate them responsibly. Here's how we comply:
3. Human Oversight & Right of Appeal
Under GDPR Article 22 and EU AI Act Article 14, every assessed employee has the right to contest their result and receive a written resolution. Specifically:
- Score review requests:Any employee can submit a written dispute of their assessment result from the results page. Disputes are routed to the organisation's L&D admin for review.
- Mandatory written justification: Admins must provide a written resolution when resolving a review request. The resolution is delivered to the employee via in-platform notification.
- Audit trail: All review requests and resolutions are recorded in the immutable platform audit log with actor, timestamp, and justification.
- Employer responsibility: AI Vitals scores are diagnostic tools. Employers who use scores in employment decisions remain responsible for ensuring GDPR Article 22 compliance, including providing human review before any adverse automated decision.
4. Annual Bias Audit (NYC Local Law 144)
Employers subject to NYC Local Law 144 who use AI Vitals in employment decisions must conduct an annual independent bias audit of the tool and publish the results. AI Vitals provides built-in tooling to support this:
Note: Completing the built-in bias audit export does not itself constitute an independent audit under NYC LL144. Employers must engage an independent auditor to validate the methodology and publish results.
5. Psychometric Transparency
| Property | Status |
|---|---|
| Assessment type | Self-report Likert scale (5-point) |
| Items per dimension | 5 items (30 total) |
| Score range | 0–100 |
| Standard error of measurement (SEM) | ±9 points (estimated; IRT calibration in progress) |
| Internal reliability (Cronbach α) | Target ≥ 0.75; calibration study in progress |
| Validated for high-stakes employment | No — diagnostic use only |
| IRT calibration study | In progress; results expected Q4 2026 |
Every score displays a ±9 point confidence interval. The platform explicitly labels results as learning diagnostics — unsuitable as standalone employment selection instruments. This table will reflect updated reliability coefficients when the IRT calibration study concludes in Q4 2026.
6. Data Governance & GDPR
Legal basis: Assessment data is processed under GDPR Article 6(1)(b) (performance of a contract). Demographic data for bias auditing is collected under Article 6(1)(a) (consent) and is fully opt-in.
Data minimisation: We use first names only in AI prompts. Team analytics use aggregated scores, not individual identifiers. Scores are presented as band labels in AI-generated recommendations where raw scores are unnecessary.
Retention: Assessment scores are retained for 3 years. Coaching conversations are purged after 90 days. Accounts flagged for deletion are fully anonymised after 30 days.
International transfers: Data is processed in the EU/EEA by default. Where data is transferred outside the EEA (Anthropic API, Stripe), we rely on Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) under Article 46.
7. Third-Party AI Providers
AI Vitals uses Anthropic Claude for all AI-generated content. What that means for your data:
- We are an Anthropic API customer, subject to their Data Processing Addendum (DPA).
- Anthropic does not use data submitted via the API to train its models.
- Prompts contain anonymised data only: first names, band labels (e.g. "Proficient"), and aggregated team averages.
- Extended thinking features are used for team analytics and forecasting — these features do not expose individual user data.
8. AI Incident Response
If an AI-generated output causes or risks causing harm — discriminatory output, privacy breach, or advice that a user has already acted on:
- Report immediately to security@aivitals.io with subject line "AI Incident Report".
- Preserve evidence: screenshot the output and note the timestamp, feature, and user context.
- We will acknowledge within 4 hours (P1 SLA) and investigate within 24 hours. We will notify affected users and relevant authorities as required by GDPR Article 33.
9. Contact & Documentation Requests
Data protection questions: privacy@aivitals.io
Technical documentation / conformity declaration: enterprise@aivitals.io
Security incidents: security@aivitals.io
